Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKatushabe, Jemimah
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T08:28:01Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T08:28:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.identifier.citationKatushabe, J. (2022). The effect of public and private health care expenditure on malaria incidence in Uganda. Unpublished master's dissertation. Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/11756
dc.descriptionA dissertation submitted to the Directorate of Research and Graduate Training in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Master’s degree of Arts in Economics of Makerere Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractThe incidence of malaria typically correlates negatively with percapita national income. Numerous existing research stress the positive impact on human capital that malaria incidence decline has on economic development. This signals the importance of reducing malaria incidence. This study investigated the effect of public and private healthcare spending on the incidence of malaria in Uganda. Using an ARDL model that takes into account reverse causality and incidental relationships, the studylooked at the link between malaria incidence and health spending for Uganda over a 20year period. The results indicate that, in the long run, anincrease in public spending of one percent significantly reduces malaria incidence by 0.196at the 10 percent level of significance. An increase in private health expenditure does not significantly influence malaria incidence at the 10 percent level of significance, but at the 15 percent level of significance, a one percent increase would lead to 0.018 percentdecrease in malaria incidence. GDP per capita and urban population growth significantly reduce malaria incidence by 0.464 and 0.619 percent respectively. Whereas apercentageincrease in female unemployment and income inequality significantly increase malaria incidence by 0.186 and 0.960 percent, and one percent increase in the number of female headed households also increases malaria incidence by1.947percent. However, in the short run, public spending reduces malaria incidence by 0.158 percent while private expenditure has no impact. Results also indicate that female headed households and urban population growth significantly reduce malaria incidence in the short run at the first lag by 0.924 and 0.809 percent,respectively while regulatory quality reduces malaria incidence by 0.129 percent. The ECT coefficient is -0.166, and is significant at one percent level of significance. This demonstrates that any divergence from the long-term equilibrium between the variables and the incidence of malaria may be corrected and regained on average every quarter at a rate of 0.166 percent. Finally, the study recommends that the government should increase budget allocation to malaria reduction campaign; strengthen programs to raise household income to support private health spending; and develop strategies for well-planned and organized urban centers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.subjectMalaria incidenceen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectHealth expenditureen_US
dc.subjectPrivate health careen_US
dc.subjectHealth care expenditureen_US
dc.subjectMalariaen_US
dc.titleThe effect of public and private health care expenditure on malaria incidence in Ugandaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record