• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • School of Law (S.Law)
    • School of Law (S.Law) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • School of Law (S.Law)
    • School of Law (S.Law) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Mitigating the socio economic and ecological impacts of genetically modified organisms in Uganda: a legal framework analysis for effective forestalling

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Master's dissertation (1.112Mb)
    Date
    2024-11
    Author
    Akampurira, Jude Baks
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study investigated the legal frameworks, socio-economic implications, and ecological impacts of genetically modified organisms in Uganda. It aimed to identify gaps and weaknesses in Uganda’s regulatory mechanisms, draw lessons from comparative frameworks in Kenya, South Africa, and Tanzania, and propose strategies for the effective management of genetically modified organisms. Using desk research, the study evaluated existing policies, legislation, and institutional frameworks governing genetically modified organisms in Uganda. Key findings revealed critical gaps in the country’s legal structure, including unclear risk management guidelines, limited public participation, and weak enforcement mechanisms. The comparative analysis provided insights from Kenya’s emphasis on stakeholder engagement, South Africa’s robust yet contested legal frameworks, and Tanzania’s cautious stance, offering valuable lessons for Uganda. The findings demonstrated both positive and negative impacts of genetically modified organisms. On the positive side, genetically modified organisms have the potential to enhance agricultural productivity, reduce pesticide use, conserve biodiversity, and improve food security. However, significant concerns remain, such as increased dependency on multinational corporations, biodiversity loss, and health risks related to genetic contamination and pesticide resistance. To address these challenges, the study recommends developing a comprehensive regulatory framework for genetically modified organisms, strengthening risk assessment and management processes, and promoting regional cooperation to address transboundary issues. Additionally, periodic reviews of biosafety legislation, enhanced public awareness, and the integration of international best practices are essential to foster sustainable agricultural innovation while safeguarding biodiversity and public health.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/14111
    Collections
    • School of Law (S.Law) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV