• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHuSS)
    • School of Social Sciences (SSS)
    • School of Social Sciences (SSS) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHuSS)
    • School of Social Sciences (SSS)
    • School of Social Sciences (SSS) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Farmer indigenous knowledge and reduction of postharvest handling losses along the maize value chain in Eastern Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Masters Dissertation (2.008Mb)
    Date
    2024-06-07
    Author
    Sembera, John
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Indigenous Knowledge (IK) is the information base for a society, which facilitates communication and decision-making (Barrett, 2017). The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of farmer indigenous knowledge in addressing postharvest handling losses along the maize value chain in Eastern Uganda. The study employed a cross-sectional research design which involved both qualitative and quantitative data methods. The study was conducted in October 2022. Quantitative data was collected from 285 randomly selected respondent using questionnaires while the qualitative data was collected using focus group discussions and interview guides, respectively. Results show majority of farmers use indigenous postharvest handling practices such as harvesting maize with use of knives (46.1%) and hands (53.9%), drying on the bare ground (74.7%) and storing in gunny bags (40.7%). The use of ingenious knowledge relates directly to postharvest losses at every stage of the value chain. Farmers who applied IK recorded losses of 5-10kg of maize per 100kgs harvested. However, IK is more dominant among smallholder farmers compared to largescale farmers. Very few farmers are aware that improper handling practices cause postharvest losses. Use of indigenous PHH practices is influenced by level of education, poverty, access to modern technologies and costs of technologies among others. In conclusion, despite the availability of improved PHH technologies and practices, majority of smallholder farmers still use indigenous technology and practices resulting in postharvest losses along the maize value chain. Uses of improved technologies, such as moisture meters, portable dryers and hermetic storages devices, can help to reduce postharvest losses for maize. Improving postharvest management practices can further contribute to reducing poverty and food insecurity in Eastern Uganda. I recommend that stakeholders in agriculture devise ways of improving cost and availability of improved technologies to smallholder farmers to improve the quality and quantity of maize.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/13282
    Collections
    • School of Social Sciences (SSS) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV