Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSarfo, Fred S.
dc.contributor.authorCastelnuovo, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorFanti, Iuri
dc.contributor.authorFeldt, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorIncardona, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorLwanga, Isaac
dc.contributor.authorMarrone, Gaetano
dc.contributor.authorSonnerborg, Anders
dc.contributor.authorTufa, Tafese B.
dc.contributor.authorZazzi, Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorDe Luca, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T07:44:07Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T07:44:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSarfo, F. S. et al. (2019). Longer-term effectiveness of protease-inhibitor-based second line antiretroviral therapy in four large sub-Saharan African clinics. Journal of Infection, 78(5): 402-408.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0163-4453
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2019.03.003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/14567
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Data on the longer-term effectiveness of second line combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are lacking. We sought to assess the probability and determinants of 2nd line ART failure in SSA. Methods: A retrospective, multi-center study of 2nd line ART initiated between 2005 and 2017 at four ART centers in Ethiopia, Ghana and Uganda. Main outcome measure was virologic failure (VF) defined as VL>1000 copies/ml after >6 months on 2nd line therapy. Predictors of VF and virologic re-suppression on 2nd line were evaluated using Cox Proportional Hazards and multivariable logistic regression models, respectively. Results: 2191 subjects started 2nd line therapy, 61.5% females. Switching from 1st line (56.4% NVP-based, 70.3% including thymidine-analogues) to 2nd line therapy occurred after mean of 4.1 years. 98.9% of patients started boosted PI with NRTI backbone (TDF+3TC/FTC 67.3%, AZT+3TC 18.5%, others 14.2%). There were 267 (12.0%) VF with a 5-year estimated probability of 15.0% (95% CI 13.2–16.9). Key determinants of VF were concomitant rifampicin use (aHR 2.50 [95% CI 1.54–4.05]) and clinical/immunological failure versus virologic failure as reason for switching therapy (aHR, 0.53 [0.33–0.86]). 138 of 267 (51.7%) subsequently achieved virologic re-suppression and predictors included HIV RNA levels at 2nd-line failure: +1 log higher aOR 0.59 [0.43–0.80], experiencing change within 2nd line ART before VF: aOR 0.17 [0.05– 0.56], and more recent calendar year of 2nd line initiation: aOR 0.85 [0.75–0.94]. Conclusions: The effectiveness of current 2nd line ART regimens in SSA is good but challenged by interactions with TB therapyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectSecond line combinationen_US
dc.subjectAntiretroviral therapyen_US
dc.subjectsub-Saharan Africa.en_US
dc.subjectEthiopiaen_US
dc.subjectGhanaen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectVirologic failureen_US
dc.subjectTuberculosis therapyen_US
dc.subjectHIV/AIDSen_US
dc.titleLonger-term effectiveness of protease-inhibitor-based second line antiretroviral therapy in four large sub-Saharan African clinicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record