Etiology of pruritic papular eruption with HIV infection in Uganda
View/ Open
Date
200-12-01Author
Resneck, Jack S
Beek, Marta Van
Furmanski, Lisa
Oyugi, Jessica
LeBoit, Philip E.
Katabira, Elly.
Kambugu, Fred
Maurer, Toby
Berger, Tim
Pletcher, Mark J.
Machtinger, Edward L.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Context A frequent cause of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–related morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa is a commonly occurring, intensely pruritic skin rash. The resulting scars are disfiguring and stigmatizing. Despite the substantial prevalence of pruritic papular eruption (PPE) among HIV-infected Africans, the cause has been elusive. Objective To determine the etiology of PPE occurring in HIV-infected individuals. Design, Setting, and Patients Cross sectional study of HIV-infected patients with active PPE from clinics in Uganda conducted from May 19 through June 6, 2003. Enrollment occurred in the month preceding May 19. Each participant was clinically examined by 2 dermatologists, had laboratory studies performed, was administered an epidemiologic questionnaire, and had a skin biopsy of a new lesion evaluated by a dermatopathologist. Main Outcome Measures Histological characteristics of new pruritic lesions. Other assessments included CD4 cell count, eosinophil count, and physician-assessed rash severity. Results Of 109 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 102 (93.6%) completed the study. The CD4 cell counts in this study population were generally low (median, 46/μL) and inversely related to increasing rash severity (median CD4 cell counts: 122 for mild, 41 for moderate, and 9 for severe; P .001 for trend). Eighty-six patients (84%; 95% confidence interval, 77%-91%) had biopsy findings characteristic of arthropod bites. Patients with arthropod bites on biopsy had significantly higher peripheral eosinophil counts (median, 330 vs 180/μL; P=.02) and had a trend toward lower CD4 cell counts (median, 40 vs 99/μL; P=.07) than those without histological evidence of arthropod bites. Conclusions Pruritic papular eruption occurring in HIV-infected individuals may be a reaction to arthropod bites. We hypothesize that this condition reflects an altered and exaggerated immune response to arthropod antigens in a subset of susceptible HIV-infected patients.