dc.contributor.author | Haule, Caspar | |
dc.contributor.author | Ongom, Peter A | |
dc.contributor.author | Kimuli, Timothy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-25T07:04:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-25T07:04:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Haule C, et al. (2013). Efficacy of Gastrografin® compared with standard conservative treatment in management of adhesive small bowel obstruction at Mulago National Referral Hospital. Journal of Clinical Trials, 3 (43): 1-8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2167-0870 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10570/4483 | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
Introduction: The treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction is controversial, with both operative and nonoperative
management practiced in different centers worldwide. Non-operative management is increasingly getting
popular, though operative rates still remain high. A study to compare the efficacy of an oral water-soluble medium
(Gastrografin®) with standard conservative management, both non-operative methods, in the management of this
condition was conducted in a tertiary Sub Saharan hospital.
Methods: An open randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted between September 2012 and March 2013
at Mulago National Referral and Teaching Hospital, Uganda. Fifty patients of both genders, with adhesive small bowel
obstruction, in the hospital’s emergency and general surgical wards were included. Randomisation was to Gastrografin®
and standard conservative treatment groups. The primary outcomes were: the time interval between admission and
relief of obstruction, the length of hospital stay, and the rates of operative surgery.
Results: All 50 recruited patients were followed up and analysed; 25 for each group. In the Gastrografin® group,
22 (88%) patients had relief of obstruction following the intervention, with 3 (12%) requiring surgery. The conservative
treatment group had 16 (64%) patients relieved of obstruction conservatively, and 9 (36%) required surgery. The
difference in operative rates between the two groups was not statistically significance (P = 0.67). Average time to relief
of obstruction was shorter in the Gastrografin® group (72.52 hrs) compared to the conservative treatment group (117.75
hrs), a significant difference (P = 0.023). The average length of hospital stay was shorter in the Gastrografin® group (5.62
days) compared to the conservative treatment group (10.88 days), a significant difference (P = 0.04).
Conclusion: The use of Gastrografin® in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction helps in earlier resolution
of obstruction and reduces the length of hospital stay compared with standard conservative management. Its role in
reducing the rate of laparotomies remains inconclusive. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Training Health Researchers into Vocational Excellence in East Africa (THRIVE);
Wellcome Trust. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | OMICS Publishing Group | en_US |
dc.subject | Adhesive small bowel obstruction | en_US |
dc.subject | Non-operative management | en_US |
dc.subject | Conservative management | en_US |
dc.subject | Gastrografin | en_US |
dc.subject | Laparotomies | en_US |
dc.subject | Hospital stay | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of Gastrografin® compared with standard conservative treatment in management of adhesive small bowel obstruction at Mulago National Referral Hospital. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |